Absolutely. Deniers are just as alarmist as alarmists half the time.
Glad to finally see you admit your heavy bias….
The problem with fanatics like you is that Dave is that you think a counterargument is bias. You are appalled (or is it appelled) that people don’t buy the AGW BS and actually look at the data. Record Antarctic Sea Ice 2012, 2013, 2014.
These days Apple it is you lot that are the climate science deniers.
That was probably the biggest swing in one hear ever recoded in global ice…do you got any info on that
Kinda funny that denier graphs point towards climate change. Record high or record low both suggest change. That’s why calling it “global warming” is misleading.
Us deniers don’t deny the AMO goes up and down and Sea Ice tracks the AMO. We just deny the AMO depends on CO2.
The part that David Apelle fails to realize is that us “deniers” actually report both sides much better than the “alarmists.” Sure, you will have some “deniers’ way out there, but in general, the “denier” reporting is a lot more balanced the “alarmists” running around like chickens with their heads cut off. In fact, I have reported already that this was the warmest summer on record in the Vancouver area (https://questioningthedata.wordpress.com/2015/09/01/2015-the-hottest-summer-on-record/), and not a single “alarmist” has followed suit.
Thank you both for clarifying this, it had me rather confused!
Wow, global sea ice is at record low. Alarmist news articles coming in 3…2…1…
If it was at a record high, would deniers not be crowing about it….. Of course you would.
Absolutely. Deniers are just as alarmist as alarmists half the time.
Glad to finally see you admit your heavy bias….
The problem with fanatics like you is that Dave is that you think a counterargument is bias. You are appalled (or is it appelled) that people don’t buy the AGW BS and actually look at the data. Record Antarctic Sea Ice 2012, 2013, 2014.
These days Apple it is you lot that are the climate science deniers.
That was probably the biggest swing in one hear ever recoded in global ice…do you got any info on that
Year
This is the lowest global sea ice extent in the satellite record for Sept 14th, right? (NOAA data.)
Surprised you didn’t mention that. You would have if it was the highest. Shows your biases.
Mention it? I posted two graphs. Did you post graphs on your site for all the record highs?
But no headlines, no words to that effect….
I mentioned it right away. First comment on this article above. In all fairness I have not seen any media articles getting stupid over this one yet. I suspect that it’s because they haven’t noticed yet. They’re still focused on Arctic sea ice: http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/sep/16/arctic-sea-ice-shrinks-to-fourth-lowest-extent-on-record
Kinda funny that denier graphs point towards climate change. Record high or record low both suggest change. That’s why calling it “global warming” is misleading.
Us deniers don’t deny the AMO goes up and down and Sea Ice tracks the AMO. We just deny the AMO depends on CO2.
The part that David Apelle fails to realize is that us “deniers” actually report both sides much better than the “alarmists.” Sure, you will have some “deniers’ way out there, but in general, the “denier” reporting is a lot more balanced the “alarmists” running around like chickens with their heads cut off. In fact, I have reported already that this was the warmest summer on record in the Vancouver area (https://questioningthedata.wordpress.com/2015/09/01/2015-the-hottest-summer-on-record/), and not a single “alarmist” has followed suit.
Thank you both for clarifying this, it had me rather confused!