This is the fundamental problem with our analysis:
a) If the “Warmists” are right, we are happy because we like the “warm”; but we are unhappy since their reasoning and actions hurt us.
b) If the “Warmists” are wrong, we are unhappy because we will freeze to death; but we are happy since their reasoning and actions will no longer hurt us [they will stop attacking CO2].
sunshine hours 
This could be serious. If global sea ice continues to grow, won’t that discourage “Warmists”?
What would we do without “Warmists”?
Oh, well…
This is the fundamental problem with our analysis:
a) If the “Warmists” are right, we are happy because we like the “warm”; but we are unhappy since their reasoning and actions hurt us.
b) If the “Warmists” are wrong, we are unhappy because we will freeze to death; but we are happy since their reasoning and actions will no longer hurt us [they will stop attacking CO2].