sunshine hours

June 1, 2016

RICO Suit Against Greenpeace

Filed under: Greenpeace — sunshinehours1 @ 9:05 AM
Tags: , ,


June 1, 2016 – Resolute Forest Products Inc. has announced a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia against Greenpeace International, Greenpeace USA, Greenpeace Fund, Inc., STAND (formerly ForestEthics) and a number of their associates. The complaint included federal racketeering claims and racketeering, trademark, defamation and tortious interference claims under Georgia law.

These alleged claims arise from, among other things, Greenpeace’s self-described “Resolute: Forest Destroyer” campaign falsely accusing Resolute of, among other things: (a) “destroying endangered forests,” and “operating and sourcing wood . . . in violation of law”; (b) causing the “destruction of endangered species” and “critical caribou habitat” and risking a “Caribou Herd Death Spiral,” “extirpation” and “extinction;” (c) “abandoning” and “impoverishing” the Boreal’s indigenous communities; and (d) impairing the Boreal’s ability to mitigate climate change.

The complaint describes in detail the falsity of these and other malicious and defamatory accusations. Among other things, the complaint explains that far from being a “forest destroyer,” Resolute has planted well over a billion trees in the Boreal – which is a billion more than Greenpeace – and is responsible for virtually no permanent lost forest acreage. The complaint also demonstrates that Resolute also has not impaired the Boreal’s ability to absorb greenhouse gases, and, instead, has improved that ability through harvesting and forestation as recognized and encouraged by the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Nor has Resolute abandoned, exploited or impoverished First Nations or other communities within the Boreal forest, but instead – and again unlike Greenpeace – has created and sustained substantial benefits for these peoples through shared economic participation in the forestry business. The complaint also details how, to support its false accusations, Greenpeace has fabricated evidence and events, including, for example, staged photos falsely purporting to show Resolute logging in prohibited areas and as having harvested areas that were actually impacted by fire.

“Our company strives for the highest standards of environmental stewardship, which is why the attacks on us are so obviously cynical and thoroughly irresponsible. We have an obligation to our business ethics, and our many shareholders, customers, partners and stakeholders to draw the line after all other means have been exhausted,” stated Richard Garneau, Resolute’s President and Chief Executive Officer.

Resolute is seeking compensatory damages in an amount to be proven at trial as well as treble and punitive damages, and is represented by Michael J. Bowe from Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman LLP. Resolute’s counsel is continuing its investigation of Greenpeace’s campaign and practices, and one can provide information on a confidential basis by telephone at 212 542-4700. A website has also been established ( to catalog information and progress reports on the case and, when necessary, to set the record straight as the facts warrant.



  1. About time someone held the Greenpi$$ bullies to account.

    Comment by catweazle666 — June 1, 2016 @ 2:56 PM | Reply

  2. Resolute have completely degrades areas of old growth forest larger than the state of Maine. You can see the destruction easily from space. 1 billion new trees is but a drop in the bucket and it will take centuries to bring back similar biodiversity to the eco-system. Greenpeace should welcome a trial.

    Comment by Drewski — June 3, 2016 @ 10:12 AM | Reply

    • I doubt centuries. Huge natural fires leaving one or two species is in fact the normal situation.

      Aggressive fire suppression just leaves huge areas of forests with massive fuel loads. Clear cutting is closer to nature.

      Comment by sunshinehours1 — June 3, 2016 @ 1:32 PM | Reply

    • Drewski, you can see your own backyard from space! Canadian law requires 100% replacement.

      Comment by betapug — June 4, 2016 @ 9:47 AM | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at

%d bloggers like this: