USA NOAA January 2015 Tmax – States

Oooops: I initially used C/Decade. It is F/Decade.And I have to check the Trend.

Update: The trend is correct once I corrected the units.

Update: Here is a link to NOAA for CaliforniaOhio is doing the opposite since 1998.

January 2015 Tmax Ordered By State Rank

Only 6 States in the top 10.  Only 9 in the top 20. 27 out of 48 have a rank of less than 61 (the middle of 121).

And note that 15 states January’s are cooling since 1895 .

And 38 states January’s are cooling since 1998.

State Rank (1 = Hottest) Trend Since 1895 in F/Decade Trend Since 1998 in F/Decade
Oregon 1 0.45 1.86
California 3 0.36 2.66
Nevada 4 0.29 0.79
Utah 8 0.31 -1.6
Wyoming 8 0.38 -0.15
Idaho 9 0.26 0.33
Washington 11 0.38 0.28
Arizona 19 0.34 -0.63
Colorado 19 0.23 -0.96
Montana 22 0.44 0.83
North Dakota 23 0.45 0.85
South Dakota 25 0.3 -0.61
Minnesota 27 0.24 -1.38
Kansas 28 0.2 0.06
Nebraska 29 0.2 -1.02
Iowa 31 0.01 -1.3
Missouri 44 -0.03 -0.62
Oklahoma 49 0.11 0.05
Florida 51 0.05 -0.54
New Mexico 56 0.23 -1.67
Wisconsin 60 0.12 -2.32
Arkansas 68 -0.11 -1.43
Illinois 68 -0.06 -1.8
North Carolina 68 -0.06 -1.75
Georgia 71 -0.01 -1.63
South Carolina 71 -0.04 -1.48
Virginia 71 -0.02 -2.29
Alabama 73 -0.17 -1.65
Mississippi 73 -0.19 -1.64
Delaware 75 0.07 -2.16
Indiana 78 -0.13 -2.57
Kentucky 78 -0.15 -2.67
Maine 78 0.13 0.3
Maryland 79 0.06 -2.46
New Jersey 79 0.17 -2.12
Tennessee 79 -0.18 -2.24
Louisiana 80 -0.12 -2.02
Michigan 81 0.13 -1.92
West Virginia 82 -0.16 -2.84
New Hampshire 85 0.08 -0.63
New York 85 0.06 -1.18
Vermont 86 0.04 -0.66
Connecticut 87 0.1 -1.24
Ohio 88 -0.09 -2.85
Massachusetts 89 0.11 -1
Pennsylvania 89 0.04 -2.6
Texas 90 0.05 -2.3
Rhode Island 92 0.13 -1.14

Biggest Science Scandal Ever

“When future generations look back on the global-warming scare of the past 30 years, nothing will shock them more than the extent to which the official temperature records – on which the entire panic ultimately rested – were systematically “adjusted” to show the Earth as having warmed much more than the actual data justified.”

“Two weeks ago, under the headline “How we are being tricked by flawed data on global warming”, I wrote about Paul Homewood, who, on his Notalotofpeopleknowthat blog, had checked the published temperature graphs for three weather stations in Paraguay against the temperatures that had originally been recorded. In each instance, the actual trend of 60 years of data had been dramatically reversed, so that a cooling trend was changed to one that showed a marked warming.”

Read it all here:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/globalwarming/11395516/The-fiddling-with-temperature-data-is-the-biggest-science-scandal-ever.html

https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015/02/04/temperature-adjustments-transform-arctic-climate-history/

 

Sea Ice Extent – Day 34 – Global Sea Ice Above Mean (And 1984 1985 1993 1996 1997 1999 2000 2002 2004 2005 2006 2007 2009 2010 2011 2012)

DataSouth / North

Global Sea Ice Extent for Day 35 From 1978 (infilled) Global_Sea_Ice_Extent_Zoomed_2015_Day_35_1981-2010 Antarctic_Sea_Ice_Extent_Zoomed_2015_Day_35_1981-2010 Arctic_Sea_Ice_Extent_Zoomed_2015_Day_35_1981-2010

Climate “Scientists” Telling Big Fat Lies

Big Fat Lie: “Sceptics who still doubt anthropogenic climate change have now been stripped of one of their last-ditch arguments: It is true that there has been a warming hiatus and that the surface of the earth has warmed up much less rapidly since the turn of the millennium than all the relevant climate models had predicted. However, the gap between the calculated and measured warming is not due to systematic errors of the models, as the sceptics had suspected, but because there are always random fluctuations in the Earth’s climate.

Briggs: “No. No. No. It is as simple and no more difficult than this. A climate model consistently says the temperatures will be way up here, and reality just as consistently fails to cooperate and puts temperatures way down there. That model is therefore a failure. It is busted. It is broken. It is not right. It should not be trusted. It should not be used as a basis for any decision. It is wrong.”

Read It All

Natural Variations In Weather DO NOT Explain The ‘Pause’: Update, With Letter to Nature