That means that difference of 0.7million km2 is hidden in low ice concentration 0-15% that NOAA doesn’t show but MASIE does….
Comment by Vasja — January 9, 2016 @ 3:05 AM
| Reply
The difference of 0.7million km2 means that MASIE shows ice concentration from 0-100% but NOAA just from 15-100%. Can someone chech this?
Comment by Vasja — January 9, 2016 @ 3:09 AM
| Reply
Difference of 0.7million km2 means an amount of ice concentration from 0 to 15%. NOAA shows ice concentration from 15 to 100% but MASIE from 0 to 100%. Could someone check this?
Comment by vasjalap — January 9, 2016 @ 3:25 AM
| Reply
The graph above from NOAA shows extent just above 13 M km2 compared to MASIE at 13.7M. For January NOAA is averaging 600k km2 less than MASIE.
https://rclutz.wordpress.com/2016/01/07/hot-air-about-arctic-ice/
Comment by Ron Clutz — January 8, 2016 @ 1:27 PM |
[…] for pointing out that MASIE for 2016 is running pretty high compared to […]
Pingback by MASIE Arctic Day 7 | sunshine hours — January 8, 2016 @ 2:54 PM |
That means that difference of 0.7million km2 is hidden in low ice concentration 0-15% that NOAA doesn’t show but MASIE does….
Comment by Vasja — January 9, 2016 @ 3:05 AM |
The difference of 0.7million km2 means that MASIE shows ice concentration from 0-100% but NOAA just from 15-100%. Can someone chech this?
Comment by Vasja — January 9, 2016 @ 3:09 AM |
Difference of 0.7million km2 means an amount of ice concentration from 0 to 15%. NOAA shows ice concentration from 15 to 100% but MASIE from 0 to 100%. Could someone check this?
Comment by vasjalap — January 9, 2016 @ 3:25 AM |