sunshine hours

August 10, 2017

USA Not Seeing Hotter Days Compared to 1901-1960

Filed under: USA — sunshinehours1 @ 12:07 PM
Tags: , ,

A new climate report for the USA was published along wit the usual shenanigans by the NY Times.

What this map shows is highly damaging to the global warming alarmism industry. It proves that, regardless of average temperature trends, temperatures at the top end of the scale are not increasing. Note that this applies even in the case of California, until recently the golden child of warmists.

We may be seeing milder winters and warmer nights, but, as far as the US is concerned, we are certainly not seeing hotter days.

Advertisements

15 Comments »

  1. This is because greenhouse gases affect mostly in the night holding back the hot that comes from land and watter

    Comment by lobo42 — August 10, 2017 @ 12:20 PM | Reply

    • Nope. Its mostly because of UHI which occurs at night as the heat is released from the concrete and asphalt and bricks.

      Comment by sunshinehours1 — August 10, 2017 @ 1:11 PM | Reply

  2. That is only in thr cities.

    Comment by lobo42 — August 10, 2017 @ 1:59 PM | Reply

  3. And asphalt has a very low specific heat, that means that it will increase mostly maximums.

    Comment by lobo42 — August 10, 2017 @ 2:19 PM | Reply

  4. Sorry, you are right, asphalt increase minimums too, but only in cities.

    Comment by lobo42 — August 10, 2017 @ 2:30 PM | Reply

  5. I was wrong, asphalt has a hight specific heat, not like water, but high anyway. But higher minimums happen in all the world, not only in countries with big cities.

    Comment by lobo42 — August 10, 2017 @ 2:46 PM | Reply

  6. Reblogged this on Climate Collections.

    Comment by Hifast — August 11, 2017 @ 6:55 AM | Reply

  7. The above described effects would also happen if cloud cover increased.
    But they why would it be that and not a 0.04% trace gas that has increased from 0.03% in a hundred years. Of which we currently emit 4.6% of total emissions each year

    Which as a percentage of the total atmospheric volumn is 0.00136%…….

    It must be VERY powerful….

    But the co2 concentrations were much higher in the past so its properties must have changed too…..

    Comment by Mark — August 13, 2017 @ 12:53 AM | Reply

    • Mark, you mean millions years ago, when temps were 10C more than now. NASA doesn’t think like you.

      Comment by lobo42 — August 13, 2017 @ 5:13 AM | Reply

  8. Mark, this is what NASA says:

    https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/carbon-dioxide/

    Comment by lobo42 — August 13, 2017 @ 5:14 AM | Reply

  9. NASA explains better than I could in tthis web:
    https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/24/

    Comment by lobo42 — August 13, 2017 @ 5:27 AM | Reply

  10. NOAA doesn’t think very different to NASA.
    https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/basics.html

    Comment by lobo42 — August 13, 2017 @ 5:40 AM | Reply

    • NASA…NOAA…
      YAWN…

      Comment by catweazle666 — August 14, 2017 @ 10:52 AM | Reply

  11. Yeah, i’m sure you know more than all of them. The are so dumb……not likenyou.

    Comment by lobo42 — August 15, 2017 @ 3:34 AM | Reply

  12. Yeah, i’m sure you know much more than all of them. They are so dumb…..not like you. Great genius!!!

    Comment by lobo42 — August 15, 2017 @ 3:40 AM | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: