Yup agree, and the city should never of many homes and structures built where it flooded before without putting in proper flood controls. I bet they haven’t dredged out the bayous and they were silted up.
Just follow the PDO with a 23-26 month lag for Antarctica sea ice, ( PDO moves and Antarctica sea ice reacts after by 23-26 months I find) next yr should be another low extent year there like 2017.
sunshine hours 
And Antartic? Lowest ice extent again? Or near?
http://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/houston-has-problem-it-also-has-solution
If you build a city vulnerable to hurricanes and subsidize flood insurance … that is the problem. It has nothing to do with climate change.
https://patriotpost.us/opinion/51016
Yup agree, and the city should never of many homes and structures built where it flooded before without putting in proper flood controls. I bet they haven’t dredged out the bayous and they were silted up.
Just follow the PDO with a 23-26 month lag for Antarctica sea ice, ( PDO moves and Antarctica sea ice reacts after by 23-26 months I find) next yr should be another low extent year there like 2017.
Sunshine, i agree with you, the big problem of Houston is its development.
But what is written here is also true:
https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2017/8/28/16213268/harvey-climate-change
“First, it raised sea levels more than half a foot in recent decades”
Sea Level has been rising at a steady rate for over 100 years. Nothing to do with “Climate Change”
https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?stnid=8771450
The article fails by lying.
NASA doesn’t think as you do:
https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/sea-level/
Did you look at the Ground Data graph?
I’m worried about the graph above. Your graph ends on 2000. Now rising faster.
It ends in 2016 if you read the paragraph under the graph.
https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/climate-change-indicators-sea-level
Straight line within the error bars.
But there are also good news from your country … OFF TOPIC.