sunshine hours

September 8, 2017

Texas Nuke Plant Stays Online Amid Harvey

Filed under: Nuclear — sunshinehours1 @ 8:02 AM
Tags: , ,

Despite the forces of nature and in spite of the opportunistic efforts of professional opponents, a large nuclear power station located in the middle of Hurricane Harvey’s devastation continues to steadily produce 100% of its rated power output.

Read the rest: https://www.forbes.com/sites/rodadams/2017/08/30/nuke-plant-could-close-but-didnt-give-credit-to-resilient-operators-robust-design-and-a-plan

 

 

Advertisements

December 31, 2016

The countries that get the highest percentage of electricity from low-carbon sources

Filed under: Electricity,Hydro,Nuclear — sunshinehours1 @ 12:44 PM
Tags: , , ,

The countries that get the highest percentage of electricity from low-carbon sources

Mostly Hydro and Nuclear. And a little wind.

capture

August 10, 2016

Ontario’s Electricity Policy Disaster

Filed under: Hydro,natural gas,Nuclear,Ontario — sunshinehours1 @ 10:47 AM
Tags: , , , , ,

Massive revenue guarantees for a handful of lucky wind power generators, but no appreciable environmental benefit from Ontario’s energy policies says economics professor Ross McKitrick

You may be surprised to learn that electricity is now cheaper to generate in Ontario than it has been for decades. The wholesale price, called the Hourly Ontario Electricity Price or HOEP, used to bounce around between five and eight cents per kilowatt hour (kWh), but over the last decade, thanks in large part to the shale gas revolution, it has trended down to below three cents, and on a typical day is now as low as two cents per kWh. Good news, right?

It would be, except that this is Ontario. A hidden tax on Ontario’s electricity has pushed the actual purchase price in the opposite direction, to the highest it’s ever been. The tax, called the Global Adjustment (GA), is levied on electricity purchases to cover a massive provincial slush fund for green energy, conservation programs, nuclear plant repairs and other central planning boondoggles. As these spending commitments soar, so does the GA.

In the latter part of the last decade when the HOEP was around five cents per kWh and the government had not yet begun tinkering, the GA was negligible, so it hardly affected the price. In 2009, when the Green Energy Act kicked in with massive revenue guarantees for wind and solar generators, the GA jumped to about 3.5 cents per kWh, and has been trending up since — now it is regularly above 9.5 cents.

In April it even topped 11 cents, triple the average HOEP.

So while the marginal production cost for generation is the lowest in decades, electricity bills have never been higher. And the way the system is structured, costs will keep rising.

Read more here

 

August 7, 2016

Electrical Madness in Green Ontario

Filed under: Hydro,Nuclear,Ontario — sunshinehours1 @ 1:56 PM
Tags: , , , , ,

Go to Ron Clutz’s Page and follow the links. Horrible things are happening in Ontario!

The energy mix in Ontario’s electrical sector is dominated by hydro and nuclear, so getting off coal seemed doable.  But in the provincial government’s drive to reduce CO2 emissions and join the California Emissions Trading Scheme, they have hardwired costly energy contracts that Ontarians will pay for through their noses for decades. Meet the Global Adjustment Fee (covering a multitude of sins and mismanagement).

June 13, 2016

Ontario Electricity – Nuclear+Hydro+Gas Keeps The Electricity Flowing June 13 2016

Filed under: Hydro,Nuclear,Ontario,Uncategorized — sunshinehours1 @ 8:54 AM
Tags: , , , , ,

Lets say its June 13th 2016 10am or so in Ontario and there is about 16GW of demand.

Nuclear+Hydro+Gas keeps the lights and heat on.

Biofuel+Wind+Solar are just posturing. And they cost a fortune.

Ontario_June_13_Capture

 

 

 

 

April 7, 2016

Ontario Electricity – Nuclear+Hydro+Gas Keeps The Electricity Flowing

Filed under: Hydro,Nuclear,Ontario,Uncategorized — sunshinehours1 @ 3:00 PM
Tags: , , , , ,

Lets say its April 7th 2016 3am or so in Ontario and there is about 15GW of demand.

Nuclear+Hydro+Gas keeps the lights and heat on.

Biofuel+Wind+Solar are just posturing. And they cost a fortune.

 

Ontario_Capture

 

 

March 26, 2016

Opinion: Fukushima 5 years on – ‘The Germans are crazy’

Filed under: Germany,Morons,Nuclear — sunshinehours1 @ 2:30 PM
Tags: , , ,

There are still eight nuclear power plants on the German energy grid; once there were almost twenty. In six years the last eight will also have been shut down. No more controversies in parliament, no more public debates. It is easy to overlook the fact that a special commission is discussing just how much it will cost to dismantle what is left of Germany’s nuclear energy program, and who will have to pay for it. The energy companies? Or will taxpayers get stuck with the bill in the end? It is a debate for insiders.

Read more: http://www.dw.com/en/opinion-fukushima-5-years-on-the-germans-are-crazy/a-19109743

Just remember March 7 2016 (not that unusual) when wind dropped to essentially zero.

Or March 5th when uranium supplied 24.4% and wind 4.6%.

Capture

 

 

 

March 21, 2016

Germany Will Need 3,000 Wind Turbines To Replace One Nuke Plant

Filed under: CO2,Germany,Nuclear — sunshinehours1 @ 7:52 PM
Tags: , ,

Insane: Germany Will Need 3,000 Wind Turbines To Replace This Workhorse Nuke Plant

“Germany’s Grohnde nuclear power plant in Lower Saxony has just become the single most productive power plant in history. It just passed its 350 billion kWh production milestone, the most of any nuclear plant, and the most of any plant of its size in the world.”

“Unfortunately, Grohnde is scheduled to close in 2021, decades ahead of its useful life, like all of Germany’s nuclear plants, and the positive and negative affects of that policy are still being debated.

In 2001, Gerhard Schröder’s government decided to get rid of nuclear power from the country as fast as possible. In 2010, Merkel actually decided to extend the lives of nuclear power plants another ten years beyond Schröder’s limit. But the Fukushima disaster in 2011 forced her politically to revert back to the original plan, closing eight nuclear plants immediately and planning to close the rest in the following 10 years.”

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2016/03/21/the-little-reactor-that-could-germanys-grohnde-nuclear-plant/

German power companies have been forced to set aside 39 billion Euros for the nuke decommissioning.

And most likely Germany will still be burning huge amounts of brown coal long after the last nuke is shutdown.

 

 

Blog at WordPress.com.